Etude

I stumbled across a review of a book called Novels in Three Lines by Félix Fénéon, and given how I admire concision (or say I do, at any rate), I just had to take a look. The title in French, Nouvelles en trois lignes, is actually a pun: nouvelles can be taken as either “novellas” or “news.” In fact, insofar as the items originally appeared in a newspaper, “news” could be considered the primary sense.

The rest of the title refers to the fact that, in the narrow newspaper columns, the bits were invariably three lines long. They were first published serially in 1906 in Le Matin. Here are a few samples, translated by Luc Santé:

In political disagreements, M. Bégouen, journalist, and M. Bepmale, MP, had called one another “thief” and “liar.” They have reconciled.

Again and again Mme Couderc, of Saint-Ouen, was prevented from hanging herself from her window bolt. Exasperated, she fled across the fields.

The French ditchdiggers of Florac have protested, sometimes with their knives, against the amount of Spanish spoken on their work sites.

In Clichy, an elegant young man threw himself under a coach with rubber wheels, then, unscathed, under a truck, which pulverized him.

Scheid, of Dunkirk, fired three times at his wife. Since he missed every shot, he decided to aim at his mother-in-law, and connected.

Soon after the book arrived, I stumbled—again—across an item in the newspaper that seemed to ask for Fénéonesque treatment. I thought: Why not try my hand at it? My first attempt was too long; after whittling, it came to this:

G. Edgerton, hunting alone in the woods of Dale County, climbed a dead tree, which fell and crushed him. His carcass was found the next day.

Right off the bat I had a problem. “Carcass” is accurate (though startling when used for humans) and injects a bit of irony. The cruelty, however, is uncalled for. This was an unfortunate accident, not divine retribution. (Unlike Fénéon, I’ve changed the name and location. Do I want the victim’s family or friends stumbling across this “clever” squib? Clearly I don’t have the stomach for this.)

The next version was slightly shorter and didn’t editorialize:

G. Edgerton, hunting alone in the woods of Dale County, climbed a dead tree and was found dead the next day, crushed by the tree.

Not enough story, I thought. So—

G. Edgerton failed to return from hunting in the woods of Dale County. He had climbed a dead tree that toppled and crushed him.

—the implied drama in the home he had left in the morning for perhaps the thousandth time. Better? Maybe it needs an expressive detail (and maybe the name could be dropped):

A local hunter failed to return home. His longbow was found before he was, crushed beneath the dead tree he had climbed and overwhelmed.

Wait—is it the man who was crushed, or the longbow? With something this short, syntax really matters. And: did he survive, or did he expire? By this point I’m spinning and slipping and losing my bearings completely. I think we’d better let Fénéon do the fénéoning:

There was a gas explosion at the home of Larrieux, in Bordeaux. He was injured. His mother-in-law’s hair caught on fire. The ceiling caved in.

Before jumping into the Seine, where he died, M. Doucrain had written in his notebook, “Forgive me, Dad. I like you.”

In order to see the world, Louis Legrand, Bedroux, and Lenoël, with a collective 36 years to go, escaped from the penal colony at Gaillon.

An unknown person painted the walls of Pantin cemetery yellow; Dujardin wandered naked through Saint-Ouen-l’Aumône. Crazy people, apparently.

Posted in Random | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Ottomania

I have been waiting for Christopher Hitchens to weigh in on the Armenian genocide resolution (H.Res. 106) for weeks now. I used to agree with Hitchens a lot more in the past—back in the days when he thought “terrorist” was a stupid label and “terrorism” a blanket excuse for a brutal but ultimately pointless response, all this “terror” covering up the underlying political, economic, and military schemes and crimes being perpetrated. But over the years he has been remarkably consistent about at least one thing, and that is the Armenian genocide. I remember the time my wife and I met with him in New York City after he spoke at an April 24 commemoration. My mother-in-law went to his house in DC once for a very pleasant chat. (She had coffee. He had the usual.)

So—where was Hitchens? Can he really remain silent in the face of the campaign to kill the resolution, launched by the Turkish government and abetted by countless well-paid Americans of high (or formerly high) standing?

Today, at long last, Hitchens speaks. In true Hitchensian fashion, he gives us a good chunk of history, with Kurds, Jews, and Greek Cypriots added to Armenians in the pot where nothing ever melts. But he puts his finger in the self-inflicted wound that Turkey continues to keep from closing:

So, let us be clear on a few things. The European Union, to which Turkey has applied for membership with warm American support, has insisted on recognition of Kurdish language rights and political rights within Turkey. We can hardly ask for less. If the Turks wish to continue lying officially about what happened to the Armenians, then we cannot be expected to oblige them by doing the same (and should certainly resent and repudiate any threats against ourselves or our allies that would ensue from our Congress affirming the truth). Then there remains the question of Cyprus, where Turkey maintains an occupation force that has repeatedly been condemned by a thesaurus of U.N. resolutions ever since 1974. It is not our conduct that should be modified by Turkey’s arrogance; we do a favor to the democratization and modernization of that country by insisting that it get its troops out of Cyprus, pull its forces back from the border with Iraq, face the historic truth about Armenia, and in other ways cease to act as if the Ottoman system were still in operation.

Precisely.

Posted in Agora | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Bumpers

Peddling through Georgetown this morning, I saw this bumper sticker:

Don’t believe everything you think

A block or so later, this:

MILITANT AGNOSTIC
I don’t know & you don’t either

Skeptic to the right of me, skeptic to the left of me

Discuss quietly within yourself.

Posted in Random | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Wahoo

Every time the Cleveland Indians baseball club makes it to the playoffs, a sense of unease sets in with the euphoria. It’s only a matter of days, if not minutes, from the time they step into the national spotlight before broadcasters or bloggers or commenters will decry the “racism” of the Indians name or, more pointedly, the team’s icon, Chief Wahoo. The excellent Salon columnist King Kaufman lasted the entire Yankees series and most of the Red Sox series before he could hold it in no longer and he popped.

I wrote a letter in response. Here is it, with a few typos fixed.

* * * * *

Thanks for reminding me how racist I am

I grew up in Cleveland in a large family where playing baseball was the family passion (I’m this close to saying “the family religion”). I loved the Indians, terrible as they were throughout the sixties and seventies and eighties. Chief Wahoo was simply part of the landscape. I don’t think I loved him. He was just there. In the case of the huge revolving Chief Wahoo at the old stadium, he was really there.

I was also interested in Indians as a kid—the real ones, some of whom lived in northeast Ohio at one time and left their names for things scattered all over the place: Cuyahoga, Geauga, Conneaut, Ashtabula, etc., etc. I don’t know if there was a connection between my interest in the baseball Indians and the phantom Indians. I read a lot of books about Indians and kept my eye peeled for arrowheads in the woods. That’s all I know.

Be that as it may, as a liberal – progressive – socialist – humanitarian – internationalist white guy, I have at times felt ill-at-ease with Chief Wahoo. On balance, I wish he would retire. The problem is, he doesn’t seem to age, and he looks so damn happy. I have noticed how the Indians front office has been downplaying the image in recent years. But of the millions of people who buy Indians gear, a certain percentage actually buys the stuff not in spite of the image but because of it. They are so benighted, aren’t they? What is wrong with these people?

But here’s the funny part (if you have a sense of humor, which most people outside of Cleveland don’t when it comes to Chief Wahoo). A few years ago I happened to be talking on the phone with someone in Maine, someone I’d never met, a guy who wanted to offer his web design services to my organization in northern Virginia (I live in Washington, DC). In passing I asked about the Penobscot tribe. He seemed surprised. He asked how I knew about them, and so on. I must’ve mentioned I’m from Cleveland, and somehow or other the Indians and their mascot came up (maybe it was 1997, a bittersweet year for Indians fans). I expressed my embarrassment about Chief Wahoo before we returned to the business at hand.

A few weeks later this guy in Maine sent me an e-mail saying how he had come across some Indians (the real ones) wearing the Cleveland Indians cap with Chief Wahoo. He asked them about it, and they said they love Chief Wahoo. They actually seemed to appreciate that there was a Major League baseball team called the Indians—that someone actually remembers that Indians exist, that they, in fact, had the run of the continent for centuries. Would they also have said, “Hey, white man, lighten up! You think Indians don’t laugh? You don’t think Indians appreciate a caricature? You think Indians are that touchy and soft and perpetually down-at-the-mouth?” They didn’t say that, as far as I know. They just wore the hats and said they liked them. Are they “self-hating Indians”? I wouldn’t like to assume that. Are they idiots? or fools? Hmm—I think it would be a bit racist to think that, don’t you?

As I said, if Chief Wahoo won’t ride off into the sunset on his own, I personally would like to see the Indians management give him more than a little nudge. But I don’t pretend to speak for anyone else. And I hope to see the Indians finish off the Red Sox and beat the Rockies. Not scalp them—just out-hit, out-run, out-pitch, and out-field them on the diamond. And I hope everyone, starting with King Kaufman, can keep their pain (which I’m sure is heartfelt) at seeing Chief Wahoo from billowing forth in phrases like “outrageously racist” and easy but misleading comparisons to minstrelsy. I, too, wish fans wouldn’t paint their faces like Chief Wahoo. But then, I wish they wouldn’t paint their faces at all. Or their flabby stomachs. I wish the loud music would go, and that people would watch the game—the indescribably beautiful game of baseball—with their undivided attention. Obviously I’m an old fart.

Perhaps some especially sensitive commentators can keep in mind that the presumably racist city of Cleveland happened to field the first black player in the American League and the first black manager in the major leagues (leaving aside that the white population of Cleveland helped elect the first black mayor of a major US city, that the college in nearby Oberlin was the first to regularly admit African-American students [back in 1835], and so on). If, every time the Indians claw their way to first place in their division and step onto the national stage, Chief Wahoo makes intelligent people like King Kaufman think the people of Cleveland are more racist than those who live in Chicago, or Boston, or Los Angeles, or [name a tiny town somewhere in the heartland], then that is the best reason for killing him. Not because you happen to think he offends Indians, or because he offends you (and makes you feel strangely good being offended), but because Cleveland gets a black eye, in what should be a deliriously happy time, over a silly cartoon—an Indian who’s giddy with the pleasure of competing and emerging victorious over a pair of socks, or an entire mountain range.

Posted in Agora | Tagged , , | 4 Comments

Equanimity

As the son of a nurse and brother of a doctor (and brother-in-law of two more), this squib in the latest University of Chicago alumni magazine caught my attention: “Why Doctors Don’t Feel Your Pain.”

Brain scans show that physicians apparently learn to “shut off” the portion of their brain that helps them appreciate the pain their patients experience during treatment and instead activate a portion of the brain connected with controlling emotions. Because doctors sometimes have to inflict pain on their patients as part of the healing process, they also must develop the ability to not be distracted by the suffering, said Jean Decety, professor in psychology and psychiatry at Chicago and coauthor of “Expertise Modulates the Perception of Pain in Others,” in the Oct. 9 Current Biology. [read more]

The old bedside manner vs. expertise issue (or empathy vs. equanimity).

My mom (now retired) actually preferred working in the emergency room, because it kept her from developing emotional attachments to patients—it was all a rush of adrenaline and training and instinct, and then it was over. I know my brother—an endocrinologist—takes it hard when things go badly with those in his care. I wonder which part of his brain lights up when he’s tending to his patients. Has he learned to control the normally automatic response of the anterior insula, periaqueducal gray, and anterior cigulate cortex while at work?

Posted in Random | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Turkophilia

The Armenian genocide resolution (H.Res. 106) is due for a committee vote today. Last week the Turkish government took out a full-page ad in section A of the Washington Post in an attempt to throw sand in everyone’s eyes, and today the Post again dished out its Realpolitik garbage in support of its good friend Turkey.

I left these rambling comments at the Post:

It’s ironic that, given the amount of aid we send to Turkey (millions and millions of dollars), U.S. citizens are in effect subsidizing Turkish meddling in our own democratic processes. As for the objections of the former secretaries of state: these are the same “wise old men” who basically sat on their thumbs during the run-up to the Iraq invasion, the greatest foreign policy disaster of our time. They are so used to being blackmailed by Turkey, I think they might actually enjoy it by now. Putting the Armenian genocide in scare quotes—talking about it as if it is merely an “accusation”—is disgusting. The death marches and massacres happened; they were ordered by the central government of Turkey; they culminated decades of abuse against the Armenian population by the Turkish government. Year after year nonbinding resolutions are passed about the Holocaust, without a peep from the Post. Why? What makes them not “frivolous”? What makes them so special? Turkey needs to face its own past honestly (and the Post needs to stop enabling it to avoid that). It can’t help but lead to better things in the present.

Thomas Nephew rips the Post a new one—he has more patience (and a stronger stomach) than I do.

Addendum—8:30 pm: The Foreign Affairs Committee approved H.Res. 106 by a 27–21 bipartisan vote. The pressure is bound to increase as the measure heads to a vote by the full House. Slate has a nice roundup of blogger reaction to the Administration’s efforts to squelch the resolution. One link of particular interest goes to Joey Kurtzman’s post at Jewcy: “Denying the Armenian Genocide should be the last atrocity perpetrated by the ADL chief [Abe Foxman].” One of the comments (defending Foxman) notes that Israel’s only military airbase outside Israel is in … Turkey. However, the story is old (July). In August, the ADL decided to acknowledge the Armenian genocide as genocide (sort of). And, for good measure, here’s an article from October 2006 by the inestimable Robert Fisk.

Addendum: 2007.10.19: Finally, after letting the despicable Washington Post dominate the discussion for weeks with a steady stream of slipshod, slippery, and downright slimy op-eds and articles, the New York Times publishes a piece that makes the case for why American Jews need to support the Armenian genocide resolution—how it is a moral imperative for them, as victims of a genocide, to recognize genocide when it involves others, regardless of the short-term consequences, real or imagined.

Posted in Agora | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Fleshification

Every time I watch The Simpsons, I think: “This stuff is brilliant!” And yet I don’t watch the show religiously. I figure I’ll see every episode eventually. Why rush things?

The writing is fantastically good. It captures so much of the America of the 90s and 00s it’s uncanny. But the voices—unforgettable. So what a treat it was to stumble upon this YouTube clip of Dan Castellaneta and Harry Shearer gabbing with Conan O’Brien (who wrote for the show once upon a time) in which—it almost seems as if they’re breaking some unwritten rule for voice-over talent—they go into the various voices live and in person. It culminates in a bit of improvisation (not “brilliant,” IMHO, but rather the result of years and years of living with the characters, hence “solid” and “satisfying”).

Anyway, watch it yourself: the embodied voices of some of the Simpsons gang. If you ever thought you were more inclined to work in radio than TV (as I have—yes, over the years I have pictured myself in professions other than editor, translator, webslave …), this is for you especially. Watch how Castellaneta drops his chin toward his chest to do Homer, just like the interviewer said.

[h/t to Отдел обогащения]

Posted in Random | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Overheard

A website I don’t visit often enough is Подслушано в России [Overheard in Russia]. A number of such “Overheard in …” sites exist, actually. They remind me of the Metropolitan Diary in the New York Times, where readers share conversations, exclamations, exhortations, or other utterances they happened to experience by chance in New York City (and sometimes even mute encounters or wordless acts, which can be even more eloquent). Maybe that’s where the idea for these websites came from.

Part of the attraction of Подслушано for me is the unvarnished colloquial quality of most of the entries. But I also enjoy catching a glimpse of a life that is foreign yet familiar, firmly rooted in time yet timeless.

Like this little exchange:

Natural selection of tomatoes
18 September 2007, 11:03 am, Moscow

Customer: How much for the tomatoes?
Seller (phlegmatically): Thirty and ten.
Customer: Which are “thirty” and which are “ten”?
Seller (nodding toward customers rummaging in one of the bins): The ones they take are thirty. The rest are ten.

[Overheard at the market on Signal Street]

Естественный отбор помидоров
18 сентября 2007 в 11:03, Москва

Покупательница: А почем помидоры?
Продавец (флегматично): Тридцать и десять.
Покупательница: А какие “тридцать” и какие “десять”?
Продавец (кивая на покупателей, копающихся в одном из лотков): А вот какие берут, те тридцать. Остальные – десять.

Где подслушано: рынок на Сигнальном проезде

* * * * *

Here are two others I picked out a while back and never posted.

And because of this they erected a statue of him at every McDonald’s
21 March 2007, 8:50 pm, Moscow

Old lady with checkered bag (nodding): Yes, St. Patrick’s Day!
Another old lady (nodding in response): Aaah, right! American. Everyone puts on scary clothes, the scarier the better.*
Old lady with checkered bag: Aha! So that’s how St. Patrick made everyone laugh.

[Overheard in the Belorusskaya metro station]
__________
*This is tricky. Страшно literally means “frightening,” leading one to think the women are talking about Halloween. But it could also mean “awful” or “terrible” (though it seems to me ужасно would be more idiomatic), hence the reference by the person posting to Ronald McDonald. (Or is it the “wearin’ o’ the green” that’s awful? Help!) I wish I could straddle the fence, but sometimes a translator just has to commit. I rather like the mash-up of American secular holy days as it stands above.

И за это его статуи устанавливают у каждого Макдональдса
21 марта 2007 в 20:50, Москва

Бабушка с клетчатой сумкой (кивая): Да, день Святого Патрика!
Вторая бабушка (кивая в ответ): А-а, вот-вот, точно! Американский! Поэтому все и страшно одеваются, чем страшнее, тем лучше!
Бабушка с клетчатой сумкой: Ага, вот Святой Патрик так всех и смешил!

Где подслушано: ст.метро “Белорусская”

* * * * *

In the morning the teacher read “Tales of Power” [Castaneda] to us and after that I don’t remember anything
22 March 2007, 10:20 am, Samara

Mother to a child of about six (tired): So were you able to eat supper?
Kid (aloof, looking to the side): What?
Mother (mildly irritated): Did you have something to eat?
Kid (in the same tone): When?
Mother (irritated): Well, did Galina Petrovna come by?
Kid: (in the same tone): Who?
Mother (losing it): So where were you all day? At the nursery school?
Kid: (heaving a deep sigh): That’s what I’d like to know.

[Overheard on the No. 24 bus]

Утром воспитательница рассказала нам “Сказку о силе”, и больше я ничего не помню
22 марта 2007 в 10:20, Самара

Мама мальчугану лет шести (устало): Ты хоть поужинать успел?
Мальчуган (отрешенно, глядя в сторону): Что?
Мама (с легким раздражением): Ну поесть успел?
Мальчуган (не меняя тона): Когда?
Мама (раздраженно): А Галина Петровна к вам заходила хоть?
Мальчуган (не меняя тона): Кто?
Мама (теряя терпение): Ты вообще где сегодня целый день был? В саду?
Мальчуган (глубоко вздыхая, сокрушенно): Вот и я хотел бы знать.

Где подслушано: маршрутка №24

Posted in Russia | Tagged , | Leave a comment

:-)

How could I not take note of the fact that the smiley turned 25 today?

[Carnegie Mellon professor Scott E.] Fahlman posted the emoticon in a message to an online electronic bulletin board at 11:44 a.m. on Sept. 19, 1982, during a discussion about the limits of online humor and how to denote comments meant to be taken lightly.

“I propose the following character sequence for joke markers: :-),” wrote Fahlman. “Read it sideways.”

And it caught on like wildfire. Remarkable that we can trace it back to this point. (Or maybe this story will roust a prior inventor out of obscurity.)

Posted in Random | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Expertise

We have a low retaining wall made from railroad ties in our front yard that is deteriorating and needs replacing. We’re thinking of stonework this time, and I’m thinking we’ll want to find some Incas to do it for us. I mean, look at the work they do:

Inca stonework in Cuzco (Qosqo), Peru
Photo by Alexander Fiebrandt at Wikipedia

They may not have discovered the wheel (and for good reasons), but their building skills astounded the city slickers from Europe:

At the heart of the new [ca. 1463] Qosqo was the plaza of Awkaypata, 625 feet by 550 feet, carpeted almost in its entirety with white sand carried in from the Pacific and raked daily by the city’s army of workers. Monumental villas and temples surrounded the space on three sides, their walls made from immense blocks of stone so precisely cut and fit that Pizarro’s younger cousin Pedro, who accompanied the conqueror as a page, reported “that the point of a pin could not have been inserted in one of the joints.” —Charles C. Mann, 1491: New Revelations of the Americas Before Columbus (New York: Vintage Books, 2006), 79.

By the way, 1491 is a wonderful, eye-popping read. It will change the way you think about the “New World” and everything you learned in school about virtually empty continents waiting to be populated and developed.

Posted in Random | Tagged , , | 2 Comments